the token.
$OAIA. One billion, fixed, most of it locked in the pool. No presale, no investors, no promises. The rules below are the whole deal.
the rules
| rule | value |
|---|---|
| Supply | 1,000,000,000 · fixed, no mint function |
| Distribution | 95% liquidity pool · 5% developer allocation (vests linearly over 12 months from launch, contract published) · 0% presale, VC, airdrop |
| Liquidity | locked 24 months · lock address published at launch |
| Developer allocation | the 5% is the project's only upside. at the opening price it is worth about $260, total - so the bills start out of pocket, and the wind-down page says exactly how that ends. The wallet is public, every sale is visible on chain, and there is no sale-rate cap |
| Founder buy | one declared buy of up to $500 right after the pool opens, from a named wallet published in advance - exact block and size not pre-committed; the tokens bought are then LP'd back with a further ~$500 of ETH. Bots may front-run a declared buy; it is $500, and we can live with that |
| Contract | stock OpenZeppelin ERC-20, zero custom code, no owner - nothing to renounce |
what the lock actually does
The seeded pool - the 95% of supply paired at launch - is locked for 24 months. Nobody is promising that - a timelock enforces it, and the contract is short enough to read on your phone. Every rule above ships written down, with the address next to it, so you never have to trust anyone's word - including ours.
What the lock does not cover, said plainly: the founder's post-launch buy and LP add is the founder's own money - an ordinary, visible LP position held by the declared wallet, outside the timelock on purpose. If that position is ever sold, it happens on chain, from that wallet, in the open. The locked 95% is the floor under everyone; the founder's $1,000 is a position like yours.
On a chain that watched a launchpad die in its second week, this is the part to check, not the part to take on trust.
adding liquidity: the fee and the catch
If you add liquidity to the pool, you earn a share of every swap fee, proportional to your share of the pool. That is a real share of fees when volume is real. The risk is just as real: if the price moves hard in one direction, a liquidity position underperforms simply holding - that is called impermanent loss and no pool in crypto is exempt from it. So: adding liquidity is a bet on volume, not on price. It also makes the market deeper and harder to push around, which is good for every holder. Decide with both halves of that sentence in mind.
the wallets, published in advance
Four addresses, published before the token exists rather than after. The declared founder buy happens from the one named below, so it can be checked against an address you already had - a wallet published after the buy proves nothing. A sale out of any of these is an operator sale, and this is the whole list: funds moving out of an address that is not on it are not ours.
| role | address |
|---|---|
| Developer | 0x67DDFfB50D9fb861f5E79Af914c21b81184325Cb |
| Founder buy | 0x04E075Ef0e97937502A7dEd5625fb95b0AA0f072 |
| Operators bucket | 0x3e886eDC1f451F0c00f5A0bB79178f0c06bAE3c3 |
| Ops | 0x7D63d87FBADe61f9D9217e3333B79BB48A373D80 |
All four are excluded addresses under the wind-down rules: they are never counted as holders, and their swaps are never counted as organic volume.
live at launch
| what | where |
|---|---|
| Contract address | 0xc08d3d0a3f9ab4bce3f154b3f2650083a04063d3 |
| LP lock address | published here, verifiable on-chain |
| Operator wallets | all four, published above - the full list, before launch, not after |
| Wind-down rules | published with a mechanical methodology |
Looking for the investor deck? The investors' corner is this way.